Accessibility statement

We hold our own site to the standard we test for, and say where we fall short.

We aim for WCAG 2.2 AA. We do not claim conformance: we have not yet had an independent audit or a full assistive-technology test.

Done
  • Skip link on every page; visible focus rings.
  • Text contrast ≥ 4.5:1 for body copy; muted text raised to 5.0:1.
  • Touch targets ≥ 44 px on navigation and buttons.
  • Respects reduced-motion; no autoplaying media.
  • Semantic landmarks, one H1 per page, labelled form fields, tables with headers.
  • Light and dark themes that follow your system setting.
Known gaps
  • Older blog and knowledge-base templates still carry inline styles and some low-contrast elements.
  • Some legacy Lab pages have wide comparison tables that scroll horizontally on phones.
  • The interactive matrix has not yet been tested with NVDA, JAWS or VoiceOver users.
  • No independent audit yet: planned alongside SOC 2 Type I.

How we test

Our own Alt Personas (keyboard-only, accessibility-tree probe, colour-vision deficiency, low bandwidth) run on this site before each release, and paid testers who use assistive technology confirm what they flag.

Report a barrier

Email [email protected]. A person replies within two business days and we tell you when it is fixed.

Last reviewed 25 Sep 2026.