The agent-readiness landscape, honestly.
Scanners check files. Audits run one agent once. Monitoring sees production. QA tools test your app as one user. Here is where each fits, including where they beat us.
- Check llms.txt, robots, structured data, MCP cards
- Instant and free
- Never execute a task
- One score for the whole site
- Real agents from several vendors complete your tasks
- Behavioural personas for the people agents act for
- Exact failing step with recording
- Before every release, with Confirmed-only tickets
Static scanners
Behavioural audits
vs Zuko Agent Score
Launched 8 Jun 2026: runs an AI agent through your forms and checkout, returns a 0-100 score, a video of the agent in the form and recommendations. F…
Read comparison →vs Agent Checker
Real agent in a real browser across 20+ tasks, click-by-click replay, 7-day re-checks; agency plan with white-label reports (about £13 per audit). Fr…
Read comparison →vs Visa Agent Score (with New Generation / Kepler)
Announced at the Visa Payments Forum (10 Jun 2026): lets merchants evaluate whether AI agents can navigate, understand and complete tasks on their si…
Read comparison →vs signalCommerce (Aegis)
Positions itself as “the assurance and trust layer for agentic commerce”; Aegis runs real agents against live endpoints with prebuilt scenarios and f…
Read comparison →vs UCP Playground
Per-store × per-model evaluations over the Universal Commerce Protocol; its Models page lists 24 models scored, with funnel comparisons, PDF reports …
Read comparison →Monitoring & QA platforms
vs Datadog Bits Testing + Journey Monitoring
Announced 24 Sep 2026: AI turns plain-language prompts into browser, API and goal-based tests of your own app; Journey Monitoring joins RUM, Syntheti…
Read comparison →vs Quantum Metric AI Agent Visibility
Released 18-21 Sep 2026: an Agent Probability Score flags likely agent sessions, shows where agents fail or abandon, and separates agent from human c…
Read comparison →vs Momentic, QA Wolf and Spur
AI-native test platforms that test your own application as one idealised user, with usage-based pricing (e.g. Momentic credits; QA Wolf 1¢ per AI cre…
Read comparison →Accessibility & personas
vs AudioEye and Evinced (accessibility × agents)
AudioEye’s 24 Sep 2026 study (1,560 runs, 6 models) found agents completed 96% of tasks on accessible sites vs 31% on inaccessible ones; AudioEye sel…
Read comparison →vs CBrowser
Open-source browser automation with 29 personas including screen-reader, elderly and tremor profiles, an agent-ready audit and an enterprise tier.
Read comparison →