Comparison
alt.qa vs AudioEye and Evinced (accessibility × agents)
“They fix, we verify.”
What AudioEye and Evinced (accessibility × agents) is
AudioEye’s 24 Sep 2026 study (1,560 runs, 6 models) found agents completed 96% of tasks on accessible sites vs 31% on inaccessible ones; AudioEye sells remediation. Evinced describes screen-reader-style “actor agents” still in its labs.
Price: See vendors
What it does well
- Deep accessibility expertise
- Remediation and monitoring products
- Strong research
| AudioEye and Evinced (accessibility × agents) | alt.qa | |
|---|---|---|
| Runs real agents through your funnel | ✓ Yes | ✓ Multi-vendor |
| Behavioural personas (older, non-native, keyboard-only…) | ✕ No | ✓ 12, with published precision |
| Before release (CI gate) | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| Recording / replay per failure | ◐ Varies | ✓ Replay + narrated video |
| Human-confirmed precision published | ✕ No | ✓ Per persona, with n and CI |
| Signed agent identity, no spoofing | ◐ Not stated | ✓ Web Bot Auth |
Where alt.qa differs
They fix and monitor accessibility; alt.qa independently verifies agent and persona outcomes on your funnels and never claims compliance.
When to use which
“They fix, we verify.”
We state competitor facts only from their public pages, date every comparison and correct errors publicly. See our claims policy.
See where agents fail on your funnel.
Run one free cell on a property you own. No sales call, no card.