Agent readiness check
Is my site agent ready?
Only if an agent can finish the job. Static checkers look at files; we send a real agent through your funnel and show you the step where it stalls, with the recording.
A static readiness score
- Checks llms.txt, robots.txt, structured data, MCP cards
- Takes seconds; free
- Never tries a task
- Cannot see consent walls, focus traps or blocked agents
A free alt.qa cell
- A real agent attempts your task in a real browser
- The exact step it stalled on, with screenshot and DOM
- A persona of your choice (e.g. older adult on a phone)
- Stops before payment; signed, honest identity
97%
Share of published llms.txt files that never receive a single request. Agents act on your pages, not your spec files.
2.6%
Share of agentic activity that reaches checkout or payment. Discovery is about 76%. Most agent failures happen long before “Pay”.
Source: HUMAN Security, Jul 2026
96% vs 31%
AI agent task completion on accessible vs inaccessible sites (1,560 runs, 6 models); agents used 43% more tokens on inaccessible sites.
Source: AudioEye study, 24 Sep 2026
Questions buyers ask
Is my website ready for AI agents?
The only reliable way to know is to have real agents try real tasks on it. A static score can tell you whether files like llms.txt exist; it cannot tell you whether an agent can book, buy or get a quote. A free alt.qa cell runs one agent on one of your funnels and shows the exact step where it stalls.
What usually stops agents?
Bot management that blocks them, consent walls, hover-only controls, unlabelled buttons, errors shown off-screen, and policies that cannot be answered yes or no. See all 16 failure classes.
Do I need llms.txt?
It does little harm, but Ahrefs found 97% of published llms.txt files never receive a request. Fix what agents actually hit on your pages first.
See where agents fail on your funnel.
Run one free cell on a property you own. No sales call, no card.